![]() The "tanks" that equipped American armored units reflected the armored division’s intended role. The result was a scramble to develop an effective means to defeat the German Panzer. Initial allied assessments of the rapid collapse of France attributed the success of the German army entirely to the tank, not truly grasping the impact of the supporting arms in exploiting the breakthrough and facilitating the advance. This fostered the perception that the Panzer was the master of the battlefield. Guderian’s refinements incombined arms tactics focused on using the armored force as the primary means of projecting striking power, providing shock effect en masse. The early German success can be attributed to both technological advancements since the Great War and the use of combined arms tactics with the Panzer. ![]() The German offensive of 1939 changed the perception of the threat assault by armored vehicles. It was natural enough for the tankers at the front to blame Ordnance for the heavy casualties they had suffered fighting in the Shermans. But privately he had stated to a visiting Ordnance officer, just, after the Battle of the Bulge, "Ordnance takes too God Damn long seeking perfection at the expense of the fighting men, and you can tell that to anyone at Ordnance." The officer believed that Patton was expressing the feelings of the using arms. ![]() Patton wrote the letter because he wanted to stop what he called "the foolish criticism" of American tanks which he believed was having a bad effect on the morale of the soldiers at the front. Handy, Deputy Chief of Staff, which the War Department released to the American papers, stating that while the Tiger would destroy the Sherman head on, the Sherman could usually manage to attack from the rear and avoid a slugging match moreover, the Sherman was incomparably more reliable and long-lived, as well as easier to ship and handle, than the Tiger. ![]() Questioned by American correspondents at a press conference in mid-March 1945, General Patton publicly defended American tanks. Baldwin in the New York Times and the editor of the Washington Post demanded to be told why and the story traveled to Europe. Shortly before the drive into Germany, the American press broke the story that American tanks were inferior to those of the enemy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |